cyps

Section 20 of the Children Act 1989

Interesting post from Winston Smith:

[People think teenager Sammie] probably had a tough and challenging childhood. Well,let's consider that. Was she physically or sexually abused? No. Was she being neglected? Judging by her weight when she arrived no. Is she from a poor or underclass background as so many people presume all kids in care are? No, in fact her parents are middle class and not at all poor.

Winston Smith is the pen name of an anonymous “support worker” working for an unidentified urban welfare department somewhere in the UK.

So, just how did the likes of Sammie end up in care? Well, its all down to section 20 of the Children's Act 1989 which allows for parents to voluntarily put their children in care should they not be able to cope with them.

You learn something new every day. The specific bit of the Children Act 1989 is:

(1) Every local authority shall provide accommodation for any child in need within their area who appears to them to require accommodation as a result of — (c) the person who has been caring for him being prevented (whether or not permanently, and for whatever reason) from providing him with suitable accommodation or care.

I feel belatedly relieved my mum and dad never knew about this. Winston continues:

Now, in the case of Sammie her parents were unable to [discipline] her or set her any boundaries as a young child and when she became a teenager she was uncivilised and bullied and hit her parents, unable to cope they turned to social services. As a result of Sammie's parents inability to parent her, you the taxpayer are paying 4,000-5,000 pounds a week to provide Sammie with care (if you could call it that). Meanwhile, in a few weeks time Sammie's parents are jetting off to India with her little brother, where they go every year, as well as at least one other foreign holiday. Sammie is jealous because this is the first year she can't go. Sammie, despite her horrific behaviour is still a child and feels very rejected by her parents. Being dumped in a care home has made her behaviour worse not better.

[…] There are thousands of kids under section 20 care orders who should not be [accommodated] and spoilt (as [opposed] to cared for) with taxpayer's money. Many of them are dumped in care homes when Mummy or Daddy meet a new partner and the teenager can't cope with the new step-parent […]

An exception, not the rule surely?

The figure for children in Bristol cared for under voluntary protection orders in Bristol doesn’t seem to be immediately available. An old reference from 2005 suggests that there is a statistical return about Section 20 orders to the relevant central government department but I can’t find a specific product at National Statistics relating to Children cared for under voluntary orders.

Torchwood – are your kids in the 10 percent?

BBC Skiffy show Torchwood presents an interesting dilemma in their most recent five-part story arc. A powerful yet mysterious alien race visits earth and demands ten percent of all the world’s children be delivered to them within 24 hours, for absurd reasons of plot development.

The plot is not quite as bonkers as the plan of the aliens from eighties miniseries “V” [remake on its way] who came to Earth to steal our water, despite flying their spaceships right past uncountable numbers of enormous comets and the hydrogen seas of planet Jupiter. But it’s a worthy second place.

Anyhow, without giving away the plot for anyone who hasn’t seen all five episodes of “Children of Earth”, at some point a discussion takes place at the highest levels of British government to decide how to select the 10% of the country’s children demanded in tribute by the aliens. After some discussion of random lotteries, and further discussion of why the children and grandchildren of the country’s leaders will be safe, it is decided by a Blears lookalike that the children representative of the lowest achieving section of society will be getting a one-way ticket to Alienville.

“the failing schools, full of the less able, the less socially useful'; those destined to spend a lifetime on benefits, occupying places on the dole queue and frankly the prisons”

Given that the civil service would only have 24 hours to sort out the delivery of said children, it occurred to me that this might be a larger-than-usual Torchwood plot hole; surely there is no way you can do the number crunching and identify the sacrificial victims in the time allowed. But actually it takes about fifteen minutes.

In Torchwood, the aliens helpfully did the first bit of work and established that they wanted 325,700 British children, which if you look at the population pyramid for the UK is a pretty good estimate of ten percent of the 4-12 years age bracket.

Since the independent education sector consistently outperform the public sector, you can be confident that the lowest performing decile will be generally represented by those children educated by Britain’s Local Education Authorities. Bit unfair, but blame the teachers, politicians or aliens depending on how you look at it.

childcatcher-431x300

To make up the national total, you need an estimate for the number of primary school children in each local authority area, which you can get from the National Statistics Office. For the Bristol Local Education Authority (LEA), the figure is around 28,947, giving the local quota of aliengeld [is that a word?] as 2,895.

Next you need to rank each school in the LEA using a simple performance measure. This is easily done by reference to the Key Stage 2 results compiled on behalf of the Department for children, schools and families, specifically the average point score achieved at each school.

For Bristol, in the last statistics available 3,869 pupils sat the KS2 tests at the end of their primary education, so if we treat these as representative of the whole school then the kids embarking on spaceships would be:

School Results at Key Stage 2 (City of Bristol) Pupils taking KS2 in 2008 Average point score Total pupils
(est. 2008)
       
England Average 27.9  
Local Authority Average 27.1  
Connaught Primary School 49 22.2 324
Bannerman Road Community School and Children's Centre 38 22.5 288
Easton Church of England Primary School 49 22.9 362
Greenfield Primary School 44 23.4 295
Millpond Primary School 26 23.4 194
Hareclive Primary School 45 23.6 339
Ashton Vale Primary School 18 24.2 143
Lockleaze Primary 40 24.5 213
Compass Point: South Street School and Children's Centre 18 24.6 132
Gay Elms Primary School 34 24.6 235
Barton Hill Primary 30 24.8 311

Final check – look up each school at the Direct.gov Schoolsfinder site and record the total pupil numbers [added as last column] to establish if you are short of the required 2895 “units” as they are euphemistically referred to by the wicked politicians and civil servants in Torchwood. In Bristol’s case another 49 “units” are need to top up the quota.

So rest assured. Even though the state sector is incapable of matching the performance of the independent sector in the field of education, it does at least have the edge in production of education statistics and the potential for rounding up innocent people.

[Quick moan: can someone sit the Doctor Who/Torchwood writing team down and explain the difference between executive and legislative branches of government, and between appointed civil servants, elected politicians and military officers. And I know the BBC loves fancy costumes and flair, but American 3-star generals do not give orders to British ministers; at least not in an obvious fashion.]

Related Links:

Opening Doors

I’m in the wrong game; I should have been a web designer.

Opening Doors Bristol

Herewith, yet another web site promoting a vaguely worthy intervention by a partnership of local authority and government funded organisations:

Opening Doors is the new umbrella name for specialist substance misuse services for young people in Bristol.

It is part of the wider youth offer in the city forming part of the ‘Someone To Talk To’ services. The service involves the joining together of services commissioned by Safer Bristol from:

  • Youth Offending Team
  • Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services
  • NHS Bristol
  • Voluntary Sector

The aim of Opening Doors is to deliver a more joined up service to the most vulnerable young people across the city. Reaching out to young people in the settings and communities where they live.

One of the “Service Users” dictated the following:

When I was 11 I started smoking cannabis with my friends. I loved smoking and used to smoke it everyday. I have also tried ecstasy a couple of times but it made me feel really ill and I stayed in bed for days. At about the same time I had other problems going on and I got help from D&YPP (Drugs & Young People’s Project), BASE (Barnardoes Against Sexual Exploitation) and YOT (Youth Offending Team).

The workers at the services have helped me because they have stuck by me and they are there for you when you need a chat. One worker talked to me about the risks of using harder drugs and it made me think that I didn’t want to do anything like that. As I got older I realised that I needed to pretty much stop using cannabis as it made me lazy and I lost the plot!

I helped decide on the new ‘Opening Doors’ name. Me and other kids had to choose between lots of names and we all liked ‘Opening Doors’. I now go to the feedback group where we chat about the ‘Opening Doors’ service and we do fun activities like canoeing. It’s good to be part of the group cos everyone gets along.

Current Service User in Bristol, Aged 17

If one is relaunching a service that purports to reduce the incidence of drug abuse by young people, why would one use an exemplary story from someone who was first “engaged” (collared?) by the local authority at aged 11, and yet six years later still appears to be a regular drug user? But at least he’s had a go at canoeing.

Related Links

Syndicate content