council

Coconut Gate’s all over… or is it now?

Reminder to all interested parties:

Cllr Shirley Brown (Lib Dem Florida) is back in Bristol Magistrates’ Court on Monday 28th June on charges of causing racially aggravated harassment, or some such nonsense.

Unless she is still “recovering from a stroke” again, like last time. You’ll no doubt recall that despite “recovering from a stroke”, Cllr Brown still managed to get to a Lib Dem event to meet current Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg a few days before her trial.

 

As previously mentioned, I think it’s horrifying that British Justice has sunk to the level where shouting playground insults is deemed a criminal act. But the law is the law, and if it applies to forelock-tugging serfs like you and me, then it has to apply to daughters of privilege like Councillor Shirley Brown.

BEP: Apr 13th 2010 Bristol councillor Shirley Brown is 'recovering from stroke'

Cabinet Review June 2010 #2 – Bring out your dead

My name is Janke, Leader of the Council. Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"

The glorious leadership of Bristol City Council meets for its (second) Cabinet meeting of June 2010.

Cabinet members:

  • Cllr Barbara “Magnanimous” Janke (Lib Dem), Leader of the Council
  • Cllr Simon “Luvvie” Cook (Lib Dem), Deputy Leader and Executive Member for Culture, Sport and Capital Projects
  • Cllr Clare “The Goat” Campion-Smith (Lib Dem), Executive Member for Children and Young People
  • Cllr Gary “The Tache” Hopkins(Lib Dem), Executive Member for Strategic Transport, Waste and Targeted Improvement
  • Cllr Bev “The Beard” Knott (Lib Dem), Executive Member for Neighbourhoods
  • Cllr Anthony “New Boy” Negus (Lib Dem), Executive Member for Strategic Housing and Regeneration
  • Cllr “Nice Guy” Jon Rogers (Lib Dem), Executive Member for Health and Care [and Bikes]
  • Cllr Mark “Bulldozer” Wright (Lib Dem), Executive Member for Efficiency and Value for Money

Cabinet Business

1. “Blimey, we managed to not spend some of that money we don’t have”

ANNUAL REVIEW REPORT OF OUTTURN POSITION AND ACHIEVEMENT OF OUTCOMES

Lots of jargon in the appendices. The “£2m saved” message is largely spin. As well as over £1.2 arbitrarily deemed no longer required for contingencies, the Health and Adult Social Care department managed to overspend their budget by £3.5m.

Decision: Cabinet is asked to tell the Evening Post that they’ve saved money, and then spend it next week when no one is looking.

Barlow’s view: £2,000,000 is about £10 per Band D equivalent household. Can we expect to see a rebate in next year’s council tax?

2. “The Money’s gone to Iceland. And they’re keeping it”

TREASURY MANAGEMENT ANNUAL REPORT 2009/10

The Council’s Capital Financing Requirement is an expression of the money – borrowed with your cheque book – that they need to pay for pet projects. Last year it was £427.8m, which assumed PFI projects were off the books. This year, it is £633.3m – about twice the annual operating budget of the council. For perspective, the typical household income in Bristol is about £30k per annum.

Wisely, having changed their underwear and composed themselves, the Council Treasury team propose a “suspension of long term borrowing in order to reduce investments and thus exposure to counterparty risk”. But such strategies depend on councillors not pushing their own vanity projects.

Oh, and “the status of the Local Authority deposits with the Glitnir and Landsbanki banks have been referred to the Icelandic judiciary for resolution”. The Icelandic people have already resolved that we can piss off and die, thus I wouldn’t hold out much hope.

Decision: Cabinet is asked to put their fingers in their ears and shout “la la la” whenever the subject of paying for stuff is raised.

Barlow’s view: Bloody vikings. And bloody councillors too.

3. “Seriously, stop spending money on tat”

CAPITAL OUTTURN 2009/10 AND FIRST MONITOR 2010/11

Another financial report explaining that there is no money left.

Decision: Cabinet is asked to remember that there is a £14m gap in the current capital budget before swapping the Suspension Bridge for a bag of magic beans.

Barlow’s view: See above

4. “Bring out your dead. And burn them sustainably.”

ABATEMENT OF MERCURY EMISSIONS FROM CREMATORIA

Notwithstanding all the previous reports about the absence of money, this report proposes to spend the best part of £2m on technology to reduce mercury emissions from Bristol’s crematoria by 50%. This is because:

“Government has set a target for Crematoriums [sic] to abate mercury emissions by 50% before 31 December 2012”

In this context, Government means the European Commission (see Directive 2008/1/EC for the rubber stamp from Parliament), rather than the toy parliament in Westminster.

Rather oddly, throughout this document there is never any discussion of real physical quantities of mercury; just the same mantra of “a reduction of 50%”.

A typical stiff contain 0.9 grams of mercury (http://bit.ly/9ubWuc).  75% of stiffs in the UK are cremated (http://bit.ly/9DTtlo), and the UK’s crude death rate 10.02 deaths per thousand population (http://bit.ly/cWumOe)

Thus Bristol, with a population of maybe 500,000 [including some Wiltshire and Somerset stiffs], probably produces something like 4kg of mercury a year. So £2m cuts that to maybe 2kg?

Decision: Cabinet is asked to instantly forget the previous three reports and approve nearly £2m for replacement of the existing cremators (2 wide and 1 standard) complete with mercury abatement equipment at South Bristol Crematorium, to abate about as mercury annually as would fit in a sphere 14 inches in diameter (bit bigger than a standard football) about the size of a tennis ball (see Mark Wadsworth for correct calculation).

Barlow’s view: Well if it was based on law out of Westminster, we might have some wiggle room. But since it’s European law, we’re stuffed.

4. “Hopkins’ Glory”

NEW EARTH SOLUTIONS CONTRACT UPDATE AND INTER-AUTHORITY AGREEMENT

It must be great being a councillor. All the fun of taking entrepreneurial risk and spending huge wodges of other peoples’ money, without the tedious meetings with venture capitalists and shareholders. New Earth Solutions is the Council's latest commercial partner for getting shot of organic waste. The Council recently agreed a £32m, 20 year deal to feed New Earth’s beast of a composter with cardboard and the contents of your brown bin.

Lots of legal exemptions on this item. But one can comfortably assume that any negotiations between commercial entities and council officers will be comparable to a cage fight between a Velociraptor and a sofa cushion.

Decision: That Cabinet agree the proposal to implement the option to extend the contract with New Earth Solutions (NES) for an additional four years.

Barlow’s view: So when are the council-issue plastic chamber pots due to arrive? If you see former Lib Dem MP Mark Oaten hanging around the council house, then it’s time to move to another city.

5. We’re “good”

OFSTED ANNOUNCED INSPECTION OF SAFEGUARDING AND LOOKED AFTER CHILDREN SERVICES

Services in Bristol to keep children safe, and for children in care, are “good”, according to the latest independent inspection by Ofsted, published in May 2010.

Note that just because they are “good”, doesn’t mean they are good. As I previously explained, Ofsted grades can be difficult to intepret. For childrens’ services, the marking scheme is:

GradeOfficial DescriptionLayman's GuideGrade 4: OutstandingA service that delivers well above minimum requirements for usersNo children have diedGrade 3: GoodA service that consistently delivers above minimum requirements for usersNo children have died recentlyGrade 2: AdequateA service that delivers only minimum requirements for usersNo children have died this monthGrade 1: InadequateA service that does not deliver minimum requirements for users.There is a mob of reporters outside

Decision: That Cabinet agrees to put “Ofsted says we’re good” in their next electoral pamphlets.

Barlow’s view: Bristol hasn’t corporately murdered a child since 2007. I suppose that’s something to celebrate. But it horrifies me to know that their are local authorities out there that make Bristol’s Childrens’ Services look “good”.

Cabinet Review June 2010: Show me your paper(s). And glass, metals and cardboard

Being something of a one-trick pony as far as blogging goes, I suppose it is time for me to start delving back into the wonderful world of council meetings and documents.

After the sucess of my Eye of Argon reading, I’m pondering a move into video blogging, but the trouble is that reading through local government documents brings on an urge to groan and facepalm simultaneously, which test shots prove to be quite off-putting; it’s like watching an Emo Zombie.

facepalm

So while I work on presentation skills, here’s a quick précis of the nonsense about to be inflicted on Bristol subsequent to the 10th June 2010 Meeting of the Full Cabinet of the City.

But first:

Say No to the Residents Parking Scheme. Again. Tomorrow is the last day to register your concerns about a residential parking scheme for Kingsdown. Again. The team at Keep Parking Free continue to point out how counterproductive this plan will be, and the duplicitous nature of the current consultation. You can read my old post about how the same plans keep being put forward again and again. And again.

Back to the June 2010 City Cabinet:

Residential Futures – Supervised housing for the Elderly and the Demented.

Property prices are down, so flogging old Elderly Peoples Homes (EPHs) to pay for the capital costs of building new, cheaper, EPHs is a non-starter. And an elegant bit of economic sabotage called the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 is also about to put employment costs up.

Project is halted. Cabinet is asked to double-halt it, no return.

Barlow’s view: Well I haven’t got £10 million quid spare. Sounds like the right decision, although as the Irish Sat Nav usually says “Ah well, if you want to get where you’re going, then I wouldn’t start from here”

Waste Not, Want Not

The City’s contract for rubbish collection and street cleaning runs to Nov 2011. Public procurement is largely an exercise is creating plausible deniability between the actions of policy makers and the outcomes delivered by operators, so this report proposes to replace one horrendous tendering process with another, called Competitive Dialogue; in which the existential horror and opportunities to balls it all up are far more nuanced. It’s touched by the damp hands of both the Office of Government Commerce and the European Commission, thus you can be sure that whatever the outcome it will involve spending your money on something you don’t want.

Competitive Dialogue is supposed to be ideal for “particularly complex projects”. It’s a testament to British ingenuity that collecting and disposing of rubbish can be so complicated.

Council is asked to approve change of procurement policy, hope something magical happens before next November and pause for subsidised tea and sandwiches.

Barlow’s view: Really? Does collecting rubbish have to be so complicated?

Smaller Wheelie Bins for all

Currently you probably have a 240 litre wheelie bin outside your house, which if you’re lucky is emptied once a fortnight.

Well, good news. If it gets lost or stolen, the council will send you a new 180 litre wheelie bin. So if it gets lost or stolen, you won’t tell the council, will you? You’ll buy a new 240 litre from one of the many DIY shops that I guarantee will start selling them. Wheelie Bins available online in a variety of colours for about £50.

Unsurprisingly, this is all part of the ongoing fraud of pretending that Landfill space is expensive, and then requiring the populace to grub about cleaning and sorting their practically worthless rubbish. I say practically worthless, as Bristol did receive about five quid per household for selling dry recyclates. But then again the costs of actually collecting the rubbish seem to keep going up, and the costs never include your time and labour at the task of unpaid rubbish sorting.

Cabinet is asked to approve the roll-out (no pun intended) of smaller wheelie bins.

Barlow’s view: Recycling is largely wasteful in time and energy, and thus unsustainable. if it makes you feel good, knock yourself out,  but don’t patronise the rest of us by trying to position it as a moral act. Or at least not until you stop using the toilet and start spreading your night soil on the garden.

Recycling for All. War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength

Otherwise known as ‘compulsory recycling’

The pilot project requires households to use their black boxes for recycling paper, glass and cans. It is intended that those who do not participate in the pilot project after receiving support and advice from officers shall be subject to legal enforcement action. Residents that live in flats and share communal bins will be excluded from the pilot project. It is intended that Recycling For All be rolled out city wide if this pilot project is successful. The pilot will also encourage residents to use their food waste bins.

Yes, that’s right. If you don’t listen to “support and advice from officers” then it’s off to court you go. Bristol will continue to spend tens of thousands on “Waste Doctors”, including £45,000 for two Full-time staff starting next year. You, the taxpayer, will be paying these people to nag you and take you to court.

Cabinet is asked to seriously countenance paying money to people who style themselves “Waste Doctors” with a straight face.

Barlow’s view: Anyone who hasn’t been to medical school turning up at my door calling themselves a Doctor will be struck off (the doorstep).

Grove Wood – Proposed Local Nature Reserve

Blimey - something sensible. Grove Wood is owned by the peculiar Lord Houshang Jafari Najafabadi, [that’s a bloke with the first name “Lord”, not a peer of the realm] who bought the land (already in a Conservation area) in 2007 and promptly started chopping the trees down.

Cabinet requested to authorise Head of Legal to make a Compulsory Purchase Order to acquire the site for the purpose of a Local Nature Reserve and if the Compulsory Purchase Order is confirmed declare the site as a Local Nature Reserve in consultation with Natural England.

Barlow’s view: CPOs aren’t something to be resorted to lightly [I’m talking to you, Mark Wright, and you, Helen Holland]. But there’s no argument that the land is already protected, that it contains a public right of way, and that the current owner has been neglecting his duties which were clearly delineated at the time of purchase. The land was worth £39,000 when it was purchased; after 3 years of neglect, I reckon it must be worth much less now. Lord Jafari – have you got change for a tenner?

See the Snuff Mills Blog for more info

Closure of Stockwood Green Primary School

Unlike previous Primary school closures, this one has been pretty unremarkable. My assumption has always been that smaller schools offer better outcomes, but in this case parents appear unimpressed with Bristol’s smallest Primary school. Test scores might indicate why.

Cabinet requested to put Stockwood out of its misery

Barlow’s View: The customer is always right. If the parents don’t want this school, then it’s for the chop. On a related note, parents in Ashley ward were trying to start a new secondary school a while ago. Why not help them out? The Malcolm X Centre used to be a school, and it’s in the perfect location. Is the CofE still the freeholder?

Syndicate content