Employment Change

Bristol is 'run by a bunch of idiots'

Peter Hargreaves has retired as Chief Executive of Hargreaves Lansdown, presumably with plans to make a huge pile of all his riches beneath a mountain, then climb on top of it and go to sleep for a couple of centuries.

And good luck to him. Neither aristocrat nor media elite, he’s a grammar school boy who started trading from a spare bedroom with partner Stephen Lansdown, and built one of the UK’s most recognised financial services brands. In entrepreneurial circles, the man is a rock star.

As part of his last day of business, he took the time to give an interview to the Bristol Evening Post’s South West Business team. It’s brilliant:

"Bristol is run by a complete bunch of idiots and that has always been the case as long as I have been here," he said. […]

"They are dreadful people and I wouldn't employ any of them, as far as I am concerned none of them has done a decent day's work in their lives." […]

"They have made a complete mess of the traffic system. You have to ask yourself what the dreadful bus lanes are about and why they insist on putting traffic lights everywhere. Rather than making things better, they have just brought the city to a standstill. I would have sacked the lot of them years ago."

And he had a few things to say about the national party leaders:

"Gordon Brown is an odious man, I wouldn't even shake his hand and as for David Cameron he is just another Tory toff. The problem with Nick Clegg is that he is tarred with the Brussels brush.

"There is no way that we should be in Europe, there is all the legislation and regulations coming from people who have not even been elected."

An anonymous city council spokesperson (i.e. Barbara Janke probably) replied:

"We have appreciated Peter's forthright views over the years. Hargreaves Lansdown are a great business success story in the city and we wish him well."

What Money Means (Answer: Influence)

Via Bristol City Council:

Bristol organisations enter the dragons’ den to bid for £2,000

Sixty children will be at the Council House, on Wednesday 1 July, to decide which Bristol project to help promote good personal finance should benefit from £2,000.

Part of a groundbreaking new project for the city involving sixteen primary schools, 'What Money Means' is a programme designed to support them in teaching about managing money.  Seventy 10 and 11 year olds have taken part so far.

And what better way to teach children “What Money Means” that to hold a reality-TV style contest in which they are encouraged to vote on which of a group of begging supplicants should be given £2,000 of someone else’s money. Supplicants include Bordeaux Quay Cookery School, Baggator, St Pauls Learning Community Team, Travelling Light Theatre and the Big Issue.

Bristol is one of a handful of places in the UK selected to take part in a National Programme funded by HSBC and run by the Personal Finance Education Group (pfeg). The Bristol project is unique in the way that it is putting young people in charge of learning and business decisions.

pfeg (lower case obligatory) are a funny bunch. It would appear they used to be a legitimate registered charity supported by UK banking and insurance companies. But they’ve taken £17 million (£3.4 million in 2008) from the Financial Services Authority to run the “Learning Money Matters” scheme. This grant constitutes 85% of pfeg’s annual income in 2008, putting them safely in the territory of being considered a Fake Charity.

According to pfeg:

In April 2006 the Financial Services Authority (FSA) - the independent body which regulates the finance industry - committed £17 million over five years to fund Learning Money Matters. In the first year significant contributions also came from Bank of America, AEGON and UBS.

The three named donors contributed £350,000. That’s approximately 2% of the £17m contribution from the FSA, which it is worth repeating is the government body charged with regulating the activities of Financial Services Companies such as…Bank of America, AEGON and UBS. If you’re interested in becoming a member of pfeg, the annual subscription is £10,000. Members include the British Bankers’ Association, The Building Societies’ Association and The Royal Bank of Scotland Group. The current chair of the pfeg trustees is Ron Sandler, the non-domiciled, government-appointed chair of publicly-owned money pit Northern Crock.

Why was the FSA dabbling in educational matters (using other people’s money), through a charity solely operated by their own charges when they should have been trying to prevent this, this, this, and even this.

Back to today’s event:

Cabinet Member for Children and Young People, Councillor Clare Campion-Smith, said: “Today it is more important than ever that we teach our children the value of money - both how to spend wisely and how to plan for the future.  Our partnership with HSBC has added valuable expertise and I hope that the project has taught this generation to look after their finances sensibly.”

Head of HSBC in the Community, Pete Bull, said: "What Money Means provides much needed high quality financial capability education in schools. At HSBC we are very keen to see a generation of pupils who really understand money. What really excites me is the imaginative approaches adopted in teaching this material - and we have a fantastic example of that on show today. Bristol pupils are being given a chance to use what they have learnt to make a real financial decision. That is What Money Means at its best."

HSBC’s contribution to pfeg is £3.4 million over five years (£744,793 in 2008) to run the What Money Means (Primary) project.

While you’re being corporately responsible, HSBC, perhaps you could rethink your policy of refusing to hand over CCTV footage relating to criminal investigations to the Police without a court order.

Related Links

English Democrats – new Mayor of Doncaster interviewed by BBC. Hilarity ensues.

Note – BBC Bristol haven’t objected yet to me posting short segments of their programmes on You Tube as long as they are attributed; hopefully BBC Sheffield have the same view.

This is a segment of The Toby Foster Bigger at Breakfast Show from BBC Sheffield, in which Toby interviews newly elected Mayor of Doncaster, Peter Davies (Eng Dem). Please try not to gnaw through your knuckles when listening to this, as it really is quite painful. A full transcript is available at Luke’s Blog, which was originally published at Andy’s Org.

Doncaster, a city large town in the North of England, is one of relatively few local authorities in the country to have a directly-elected political chief executive – a Mayor. This is a good idea, and I prefer this model of municipal government to Bristol’s “cabinet+chief executive” model where an executive cabinet is formed from elected councillors and express their policy through an appointed Chief Executive.

To avoid further confusion – the concept of an elected Mayor is distinct from (e.g.) the civic office of Lord Mayor of Bristol, which in our city performs the honorary role of “first citizen” and the legislative role of chairing meetings of the full council.

Anyhow, on June 4th, the voters of Doncaster elected Peter Davies of the English Democrats. Interestingly the election used the Single Transferable Vote (STV) system, and Mr Davies squeaked through ahead of an independent on the basis of second preference votes. None of the major national parties were even close to being in the running.

Followers of Bristol politics may recall that the English Democrats were the party that hijacked a popular local Facebook group and turned it into a campaigning platform.

The best one can say about this interview – being extremely charitable - is that perhaps Mayor Davies was ill-prepared to discuss detailed policy points. Perhaps he was expecting something a bit more light hearted - "getting fitted for chains of office" and "settling in to the office".

PeterDavies

Regardless - the key learning point: there is no such thing as a friendly media interview if you're nominally right of centre. Prepare for the worst.

Some of his points did actually have a reasonable argument behind them. There is a good rationale for getting rid of "diversity" departments, but employment law, contracts of employment and public sector unions all mean that it is not just a case of pointing at people Alan-Sugar-style and yelling "You're fired".

The interviewer also offered a non-sequitur that for a Council to cut in-house translation services "is, under the European Court of Human Rights it’s illegal." But this is simply incorrect. There is no legal obligation from the ECHR or anywhere else to translate routine local authority publications and documents into non-native languages, although there is one relating to criminal charges. Regardless, such a service could be offered more efficiently - on-demand telephone translation or even with Google Translate.

Related Links

Syndicate content