Business

Academies in Bristol – School Reform and Job Cuts. What’s not to like?

[Note – front page of the UK parliament’s website is currently broken. This link works.]

The Academies Bill [Latest Draft] is on the final stretch in parliament, and seems likely to pass before the summer recess. The blurb is:

Academies are all-ability state funded schools. They have sponsors from a wide range of backgrounds, including universities and colleges, educational trusts, charities, the business sector and faith communities.

The big difference with (new) Academies is that they are entirely removed from Local Authority oversight (they are not “maintained”). Now my usual working theory is that life will be a lot easier for everyone if we get rid of as many layers of government bureaucracy as possible, starting at the centre. This Bill concerns itself with the middle-men at the Local Authorities, whereas I would have opted for a massive reduction in head count amongst the mandarins at the Department for Education (no longer the “Department for children, schools and families” and properly capitalised).

Will this legislation improve state education in Bristol, or indeed Britain? Not for a few years, no. This new legal status won’t magically solve the three major problems of parental indifference, weak senior management teams and teachers motivated more by ideology than idealism. But it’s a start, and once passed the Act will remove most of the obligations on a school to adhere to the National Curriculum, and create some opportunities for cost savings in Local Government.

Cuts in Local Government: break out the Chaumet Sparkling Perry (£1 at Lidl)

Since Academies will not be maintained, they will be funded directly by a grant (per pupil) from central government, I believe the affect on Councils will be a reduction in the council’s Dedicated Schools Grant, and probably the Area Based Grant and its share of National Non-Domestic [Business] Rates by the time some of the other marginal programmes have been cleared out.

As soon as this Bill becomes an Act of parliament, the theory is that all schools currently deemed “outstanding” by Ofsted will automatically be able to tell their Local Authority to get stuffed, thus – again, in theory – the process could start as early as September/October 2010 after parliament returns.

There is a slight fly in the appointment: none of Bristol’s existing maintained secondary schools have an outstanding ratings; only the Voluntary Aided School St Bede’s Catholic College manages that.

  • Total number of state secondary schools in BCC area: 20 (see here)
  • Total number of BCC maintained schools and existing academies: 20 (see here)
  • Number of maintained secondary schools with “Outstanding” ratings: ZERO (via Ofsted)

Which is pretty amazing when you look at the numbers involved:

But if we look at Primary Schools as well:

  • Total number of state primary schools in BCC area: 138 (see here)
  • Number of maintained secondary schools with “Outstanding” ratings: 9 (via Trym Tales)

then we’re in business. Taking 6.5% of schools out of LEA control is a reasonable basis for a headcount cut of say… 5% as a starter? Rounding up, let’s say 30 Full Time Equivalent LEA Staff.

As to what affect this will have on Bristol Council’s £400m annual budget (yes, really, £400 million, and that doesn’t count the running costs of the schools), my guess would be a reduction of around £8-10 million in the dedicated schools grant. A 30-person cull within CYPS could potentially bolster this with a £750,000 cut in Council Tax next year. That’s only about £5 for each tax paying household, but it’s better than a kick in the teeth.

Add in a few non-job holders like the Enrichment Coordination team (£57k), the Playing for Success Scheme (£50k), the Business Partnership Manager (£62k), the Drugs Coordinator team (£149k), the 14-19 Advisor consulting contract (£159k), the EMAS service (£35k), and cheaper biscuits for the SACRE meetings (£17k) then suddenly you’ve got a fairly decent set of cuts; maybe an easy £10 off a typical Band D council tax bill.

Local Note

The recently deflowered Charlotte Leslie MP (Coalition, Bristol North West) has got herself a place on the Education Select Committee, so she’ll no doubt be front and centre with subsequent Academies legislation.

Putting tables and chairs on “the Council’s streets”

Right, that’s it. How do you start a political party? If anyone asks, it was the email about chairs wot did it. The “Council’s streets”? The “Council’s streets”? They’re our bloody streets.

I can see some logic in a bit of light regulation on street trading, but this is ridiculous: the Council are proposing a £55 charge if a rate-paying business wants to put a table and chair outside their property. If one looks at the minutes of the relevant meeting back in April 2010:

Nick Carter, Licensing Manager reported that informal arrangements for tables and chairs on the highway currently rested with City Development officers who were responsible for agreeing suitable arrangements so that the highway was kept clear. However, since the introduction of smoking regulations greater use is being made of outside areas leading to an increase in concerns from local communities in relation to public nuisance. It was therefore proposed to introduce a more formal scheme under the Council's Safer Bristol Licensing team which would compliment the existing activity undertaken by that team.

Funny that. Introduce one round of legislation (preventing smoking in private buildings) and suddenly you have a new problem, and an opportunity to raise more levies on taxpayers.

I think the committee got it wrong on this one, and kudos to Councillor Jenny Smith (Lab) for raising the point that some small businesses would have difficulty paying the fees. This did prompt an interesting response from an officer:

Pauline Powell, Legal Advisor, replied that the Council had other powers to deal with such an issue such as its well-being powers. She suggested that officers could ask the question in their consultation for examples of where the fees should be waived;

“Well-being” powers to allow the waiver of statutory fees and other taxes. That’s one to put in the “investigate further” pile.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Neighbourhood Partnerships Neighbourhood Partnerships <neighbourhood.partnerships@bristol.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:02 PM
Subject: Tables and chairs-licence.
To: neighbourhood.partnerships@bristol.gov.uk

It was agreed by the Licensing Committee on 8 April 2010  that the council would consult on proposals to introduce a scheme to regulate the placing of tables and chairs outside of bars, cafes or similar types of premises on the council’s streets.

The draft proposals recommend a city wide scheme in which applicants wishing to place tables and chairs on the highway would need to make an application to the council who would seek the views of persons who appear to be materially effected by the proposal prior to making a decision. The proposed charge for a permission will be £55 for a table and/or up to four chairs (and multiples thereof). The council is particularly interested in your views on the following matters:

  • (a) Should the scheme apply city wide?
  • (b) Whether the charges should apply to all types of premises e.g. premises licensed to supply alcohol (e.g. bars) as well as premises that do not supply alcohol (e.g. local cafes)?
  • (c) Do you have any other comments relating to these proposals?

Further information can be found at www.bristol.gov.uk/licensing. Any comments should be submitted by 29th July 2010 to nick.carter@bristol.gov.uk […]

BCS News: Deckchairs to go on the port side of the Titanic

Well, I have to say, I thought the Starboard side had its merits, but there you go.

The results of the Extraordinary General Meeting of the British Computer Society are now available. Roughly 3 to 1 in favour of the status quo. (full results here)

The result of the recent EGM has seen the professional members of BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, voting to support the Trustee Board, CEO and the transformation programme, giving a clear mandate for the future.

I and the rest of the Trustee Board would like to thank everyone who has taken the time to engage in the debate that has developed around the issues that were raised. We also want to thank everyone who has taken the time to vote; whichever way you voted.

Whilst the EGM itself is over and the result clear, the conversation needs to continue. Everyone needs to reflect on all that we've learned from this process. It has, without a doubt, created dialogue in a way that has never taken place before. However, this is not enough; we need members, Trustees and Council to continue this level of engagement and to continue talking to each other directly. We need everyone to play their role and take responsibility in developing the future of BCS.
The most important thing now is to concentrate on the future. We must all - Trustee Board, Council, members, Executive Board and employees - work together, to create an organisation which we can be proud of, which fulfils our royal charter, remains relevant to members and to the IT profession as a whole.

Feedback is welcome on the new Member Network discussion 'Moving Forward'.
Yours sincerely,
Elizabeth Sparrow
BCS President

Syndicate content